If increasing hbase.client.scanner.caching makes no difference you have another 
issue.
How many rows do you expect your to return?

On contemporary hardware I manage to scan a few million KeyValues (i.e. 
columns) per second and per CPU core.
Note that for scan performance you want to increase the BLOCKSIZE.


-- Lars



________________________________
 From: LEI Xiaofeng <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Monday, January 6, 2014 11:06 PM
Subject: hbase read performance tuning failed
 

Hi,
I am running hbase-0.94.6-cdh4.5.0 and set up a cluster of 5 nodes. The random 
read performance is ok, but the scan performance is poor.
I tried to increase "hbase.client.scanner.caching" to 100 to promote the scan 
performance but it madeĀ  no difference. And when I tried to make smaller blocks 
by setting "BLOCKSIZE" when created tables to get better random read 
performance it made no difference too.
So, I am wondering if anyone could give some advice to solve this problem.



Thanks

Reply via email to