bq. I have disabled all processing in my observer

Was it possible that there was other modification going on (such as Append)
?

Cheers


On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:26 AM, aa a <[email protected]> wrote:

> Here is my pre job run result,
>
> hbase(main):035:0> get 'subsrptn','8322910300|111021583220'
> COLUMN                               CELL
>
>  all_cf:custId                       timestamp=1391797558233,
> value=111021583220
>
>  all_cf:dataDt                       timestamp=1391797558233,
> value=2013-11-14
>
>  all_cf:mktCd                        timestamp=1391797558233, value=hcl
>
>  all_cf:rplctLogSeqNbr               timestamp=1391797558233, value=100
>
>  all_cf:rplctOprnType                timestamp=1391797558233, value=UPDATE
>
>  all_cf:subsrptnNbrTxt               timestamp=1391797558233,
> value=8322910300
>
>  all_cf:subsrptnStsCd                timestamp=1391797558233, value=XXXX
>
>  all_cf:subsrptnStsRsnCd             timestamp=1391797558233, value=SOCHI
>
> 8 row(s) in 0.0570 seconds
>
> for now, I have disabled all processing in my observer: by simply having
> this,
> public void prePut(ObserverContext<RegionCoprocessorEnvironment> e,
> Put put, WALEdit edit, boolean writeToWAL) throws IOException {
> e.bypass();
> }
> What this means is that when I try to do a put, it should fail, right?
>
> my job is comprised of HDFS source and HBase sink via,
> TableMapReduceUtil.initTableReducerJob( Statics.TABLE_NAME, null, job);
> ---
> so the table puts are taken care of by TableMapReduceUtil.
>
> When I run my job, the "get" returns this:
> hbase(main):036:0> get 'subsrptn','8322910300|111021583220' COLUMN CELL ...
> ..
> [ omitted for brevity ]
> all_cf:subsrptnStsRsnCd timestamp=1391801091387, value=SOCHI-1
>
> Notice that the value and timestamp have changed.
>
> Why do I see this?
>
> ameet
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > bq. However, calling bypass() seems to have no effect.
> >
> > In HRegion :
> >
> >           if (coprocessorHost.prePut((Put) m, walEdit,
> m.getWriteToWAL()))
> > {
> >             // pre hook says skip this Put
> >             // mark as success and skip in doMiniBatchMutation
> >             batchOp.retCodeDetails[i] = OperationStatus.SUCCESS;
> >
> > Can you be a bit more specific about your observation ?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:02 AM, aa a <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'd like to perform a put but have it succeed only if certain
> conditions
> > > based on values of some columns are met.
> > > I am on 0.94.6
> > >
> > > my first option was:
> > > write a prePut() Observer, perform the checks in there and then call a
> > > bypass() if needed.
> > > However, calling bypass() seems to have no effect. I thought that
> > bypass()
> > > would cause HBase to not perform the put.
> > > Is that not correct?
> > >
> > > second option:
> > > write a preCheckAndPut() and perform the validations there. problem is
> > that
> > > I have been running the process via a map/reduce and using
> > > TableMapReduceUtil.initTableReducerJob(
> > >         TABLE_NAME,
> > >         null,
> > >         job);
> > > And there seems to be no way to tell this to use "checkAndPut" instead
> of
> > > "put", is there?
> > >
> > >
> > > third option:
> > > I could try to do my own htable.checkAndPut from the mapper. However,
> > since
> > > I am on a kerberized cluster, I am not able to get an htable in the
> > setup()
> > > method of the mapper.
> > > GSS initiate failed [Caused by GSSException: No valid credentials
> > provided
> > > (Mechanism level: Failed to find any Kerberos tgt)]
> > >  trying to perform UserGroupInformation.loginUserFromKeytab() fails
> too;
> > > I  get Caused by: javax.security.auth.login.LoginException: Unable to
> > > obtain password from user
> > > So I am not able to do any htable call from the mapper.
> > >
> > > The only M/R that has worked for me to read from HDFS text file as
> source
> > > and write to HBase sink is TableMapReduceUtil.initTableReducerJob()
> with
> > > null for reducer class.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > Thank you much in advance
> > >
> > > ameet
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to