HBASE-9468 introduced "fail.fast.expired.active.master" and went into 0.94.12
I assume x >= 12 in your case. Cheers On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Kristoffer Sjögren <[email protected]>wrote: > 0.94.x > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Are you using 0.94.x or 0.96.y ? > > > > Cheers > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Kristoffer Sjögren <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > > > > I have some tests that check client behaviour during a controlled HBase > > > restart. Everything works as expected and the client is able to recover > > > after a while. > > > > > > However, after doing the same tests with the Asynchbase I noticed that > > this > > > client recovers almost instantly after HBase comes back up - whereas > the > > > standard HConnection recovers much later (around 30 seconds). > > > > > > I played around with two properties without much time to recovery > > > reduction. > > > > > > fail.fast.expired.active.master=true > > > zookeeper.session.timeout=5000 > > > > > > Any tips on how to improve time to recovery? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > -Kristoffer > > > > > >
