Thanks for you help, It turns out the prePut method signature had changed
slightly and I had not implemented the correct interface for 0.96 and since
I didn't have the @override decorator it just silently did the default
behavior
public void prePut(final ObserverContext<RegionCoprocessorEnvironment>
e,
final Put put, final WALEdit edit, final
Durability durability) throws IOException .
instead of the .94 version
*public void prePut
<http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/apidocs/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/coprocessor/BaseRegionObserver.html#prePut(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.ObserverContext,
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.Put,
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.WALEdit,
boolean)>*(ObserverContext<http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/apidocs/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/coprocessor/ObserverContext.html>
<RegionCoprocessorEnvironment<http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/apidocs/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/coprocessor/RegionCoprocessorEnvironment.html>
> e,
> Put<http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/apidocs/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/Put.html>
put,
WALEdit<http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/apidocs/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/wal/WALEdit.html>
edit,
boolean writeToWAL)
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Todd Gruben <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > no entry in either log i see canary checks of 'events', but no indication
> > of success/failure or even trying to load the Coprocessor. Its like
> either
> > it doesn't recognize the table_att 'coprocessor' or 'COPROCESSOR', I
> tried
> > both just to see if Case mattered. I would love to see a failure of some
> > sort, so I would know what to fix.
> >
>
> Is the default log level INFO level. Does upping log-level to DEBUG given
> you any more info Todd?
>
> St.Ack
>
