I have few tables, and I have pre partitioned the tables. I would like to achieve reduced latency. I am just thinking of placing related regions on the same region server/host. For example, table 1 contains 3 regions [a,b,c], and table 2 contains 3 regions[x,y,z]. (a,x) contains the data for some group of users, (b,y) contains the data for some group of users, and (c,z) and so on.
If I have two region servers, instead of placing [a,b,c] on one server, and [x,y,z] on other server, is there an advantage of placing related regions (a,x), (b,y), (c,z) among the region servers? Note: I also make sure the regions will not be divided further, or there will be manual intervention needed to divide the regions further. -- View this message in context: http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/Is-there-an-advantage-of-placing-related-regions-on-the-same-region-server-host-tp4061296.html Sent from the HBase User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
