Sorry ,yes it's Solr When I combin hbase with solr ，I find it have a good performance . I store the colums which should be query as condition and hbase rowkey in solr and all colums stored in hbase . so I think hbase can add the solr's(lucene) some index function as hbase two secondary index. I recommend you to look at this article which will have a help. http://static.druid.io/docs/druid.pdf
-----邮件原件----- 发件人: Ted Yu [mailto:[email protected]] 发送时间: 2014年7月16日 10:58 收件人: [email protected] 主题: Re: why not introduce reverse index into hbase for multi-dimensional query Can you describe reverse index in bit more detail ? BTW sorl should be solr, right ? On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:42 PM, 张景鹏 <[email protected]> wrote: > why not introduce reverse index into hbase for multi-dimensional query ? > looks like sorl + hbase >
