VerifyReplication is something you could use. It's not replication specific,
just named that way because it was initially conceived as a tool to verify that
replication is working correctly. Unfortunately it will need to ship all data
from the remote cluster, which is quite inefficient.
I think we should include a better way with HBase, maybe using Merkletrees, or
at least hashes of ranges, and compare those.
-- Lars
________________________________
From: Colin Kincaid Williams <disc...@uw.edu>
To: user@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, August 9, 2014 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: Large discrepancy in hdfs hbase rootdir size after copytable
operation.
Hi Everybody,
I do wish to upgrade to a more recent hbase soon. However the choice isn't
entirely mine. Does anybody know how to verify the contents between tables
across clusters after a copytable operation?
I see replication.VerifyReplication , but that seems replication specific.
Maybe I should have began with replication in the first place...
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:51 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi Colin,
>
>you might want to consider upgrading. The current stable version is 0.98.4
>(soon .5).
>
>Even just going to 0.94 will give a lot of new features, stability, and
>performance.
>0.92.x can be upgraded to 0.94.x without any downtime and without any upgrade
>steps necessary.
>For an upgrade to 0.98 and later you'd need some downtime and also excute an
>upgrade step.
>
>
>-- Lars
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Colin Kincaid Williams <disc...@uw.edu>
>To: user@hbase.apache.org
>Cc:
>Sent: Friday, August 8, 2014 1:16 PM
>Subject: Re: Large discrepancy in hdfs hbase rootdir size after copytable
>operation.
>
>Not in the hbase shell I have:
>
>hbase version
>14/08/08 14:16:08 INFO util.VersionInfo: HBase 0.92.1-cdh4.1.3
>14/08/08 14:16:08 INFO util.VersionInfo: Subversion
>file:///data/1/jenkins/workspace/generic-package-rhel64-6-0/topdir/BUILD/hbase-0.92.1-cdh4.1.3
>-r Unknown
>14/08/08 14:16:08 INFO util.VersionInfo: Compiled by jenkins on Sat Jan 26
>17:11:38 PST 2013
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Using simplified version of your command, I saw the following in shell
>> output (you may have noticed as well):
>>
>> An argument ignored (unknown or overridden): BLOOMFILTER
>> An argument ignored (unknown or overridden): VERSIONS
>> 0 row(s) in 2.1110 seconds
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Colin Kincaid Williams <disc...@uw.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I have discovered the error. I made the mistake regarding the compression
>> > and the bloom filter. The new table doesn't have them enabled, and the
>> old
>> > does. However I'm wondering how I can create tables with splits and bf
>> and
>> > compression enabled. Shouldn't the following command return an error?
>> >
>> > hbase(main):001:0> create 'ADMd5','a',{
>> >
>> > hbase(main):002:1* BLOOMFILTER => 'ROW',
>> > hbase(main):003:1* VERSIONS => '1',
>> > hbase(main):004:1* COMPRESSION => 'SNAPPY',
>> > hbase(main):005:1* MIN_VERSIONS => '0',
>> > hbase(main):006:1* SPLITS =>['/++ASUZm4u7YsTcF/VtK6Q==',
>> > hbase(main):007:2* '/zyuFR1VmhJyF4rbWsFnEg==',
>> > hbase(main):008:2* '0sZYnBd83ul58d1O8I2JnA==',
>> > hbase(main):009:2* '2+03N7IicZH3ltrqZUX6kQ==',
>> > hbase(main):010:2* '4+/slRQtkBDU7Px6C9MAbg==',
>> > hbase(main):011:2* '6+1dGCQ/IBrCsrNQXe/9xQ==',
>> > hbase(main):012:2* '7+2pvtpHUQHWkZJoouR9wQ==',
>> > hbase(main):013:2* '8+4n2deXhzmrpe//2Fo6Fg==',
>> > hbase(main):014:2* '9+4SKW/BmNzpL68cXwKV1Q==',
>> > hbase(main):015:2* 'A+4ajStFkjEMf36cX5D9xg==',
>> > hbase(main):016:2* 'B+6Zm6Kccb3l6iM2L0epxQ==',
>> > hbase(main):017:2* 'C+6lKKDiOWl5qrRn72fNCw==',
>> > hbase(main):018:2* 'D+6dZMyn7m+NhJ7G07gqaw==',
>> > hbase(main):019:2* 'E+6BrimmrpAd92gZJ5hyMw==',
>> > hbase(main):020:2* 'G+5tisu4xWZMOJnDHeYBJg==',
>> > hbase(main):021:2* 'I+7fRy4dvqcM/L6dFRQk9g==',
>> > hbase(main):022:2* 'J+8ECMw1zeOyjfOg/ypXJA==',
>> > hbase(main):023:2* 'K+7tenLYn6a1aNLniL6tbg==',]}
>> > 0 row(s) in 1.8010 seconds
>> >
>> > hbase(main):024:0> describe 'ADMd5'
>> > DESCRIPTION ENABLED
>> >
>> > {NAME => 'ADMd5', FAMILIES => [{NAME => 'a', BLOO true
>> >
>> > MFILTER => 'NONE', REPLICATION_SCOPE => '0', VERS
>> >
>> > IONS => '3', COMPRESSION => 'NONE', MIN_VERSIONS
>> >
>> > => '0', TTL => '2147483647', BLOCKSIZE => '65536'
>> >
>> > , IN_MEMORY => 'false', BLOCKCACHE => 'true'}]}
>> >
>> > 1 row(s) in 0.0420 seconds
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
>> > jean-m...@spaggiari.org
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Colin,
>> > >
>> > > Just to make sure.
>> > >
>> > > Is table A from the source cluster and not compressed, and table B in
>> the
>> > > destination cluster and SNAPPY compressed? Is that correct? Then ratio
>> > > should be the opposite. Are you able to du -h from hadoop to see if all
>> > > regions are evenly bigger or if anything else is wrong?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 2014-08-07 20:44 GMT-04:00 Colin Kincaid Williams <disc...@uw.edu>:
>> > >
>> > > > I haven't yet tried to major compact table B. I will look up some
>> > > > documentation on WALs and snapshots to find this information in the
>> > hdfs
>> > > > filesystem tomorrow. Could it be caused by the bloomfilter existing
>> on
>> > > > table B, but not table A? The funny thing is the source table is
>> > smaller
>> > > > than the destination.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Esteban Gutierrez <
>> > este...@cloudera.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi Colin,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Have you verified if the content of /a_d includes WALs and/or the
>> > > content
>> > > > > of the snapshots or the HBase archive? have you tried to major
>> > compact
>> > > > > table B? does it makes any difference?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > regards,
>> > > > > esteban.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Cloudera, Inc.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Colin Kincaid Williams <
>> > disc...@uw.edu
>> > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > I used the copy table command to copy a database between the
>> > original
>> > > > > > cluster A and a new cluster B. I have noticed that the rootdir is
>> > > > larger
>> > > > > > than 2X the size of the original. I am trying to account for
>> such a
>> > > > large
>> > > > > > difference. The following are some details about the table.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I'm trying to figure out why my copied table is more than 2X the
>> > size
>> > > > of
>> > > > > > the original table. Could the bloomfilter itself account for
>> this?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The guide I used as a reference:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://blog.pivotal.io/pivotal/products/migrating-an-apache-hbase-table-between-different-clusters
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Supposedly the original command used to create the table on
>> cluster
>> > > A:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > create 'ADMd5', {NAME => 'a', BLOOMFILTER => 'ROW', VERSIONS =>
>> > '1',
>> > > > > > COMPRESSION => 'SNAPPY', MIN_VERSIONS => '0'}
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > How I created the target table on cluster B:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > create 'ADMd5','a',{
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > BLOOMFILTER => 'ROW',
>> > > > > > VERSIONS => '1',
>> > > > > > COMPRESSION => 'SNAPPY',
>> > > > > > MIN_VERSIONS => '0',
>> > > > > > SPLITS =>['/++ASUZm4u7YsTcF/VtK6Q==',
>> > > > > > '/zyuFR1VmhJyF4rbWsFnEg==',
>> > > > > > '0sZYnBd83ul58d1O8I2JnA==',
>> > > > > > '2+03N7IicZH3ltrqZUX6kQ==',
>> > > > > > '4+/slRQtkBDU7Px6C9MAbg==',
>> > > > > > '6+1dGCQ/IBrCsrNQXe/9xQ==',
>> > > > > > '7+2pvtpHUQHWkZJoouR9wQ==',
>> > > > > > '8+4n2deXhzmrpe//2Fo6Fg==',
>> > > > > > '9+4SKW/BmNzpL68cXwKV1Q==',
>> > > > > > 'A+4ajStFkjEMf36cX5D9xg==',
>> > > > > > 'B+6Zm6Kccb3l6iM2L0epxQ==',
>> > > > > > 'C+6lKKDiOWl5qrRn72fNCw==',
>> > > > > > 'D+6dZMyn7m+NhJ7G07gqaw==',
>> > > > > > 'E+6BrimmrpAd92gZJ5hyMw==',
>> > > > > > 'G+5tisu4xWZMOJnDHeYBJg==',
>> > > > > > 'I+7fRy4dvqcM/L6dFRQk9g==',
>> > > > > > 'J+8ECMw1zeOyjfOg/ypXJA==',
>> > > > > > 'K+7tenLYn6a1aNLniL6tbg==']}
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > How the tables now appear in hbase shell:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > table A:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > describe 'ADMd5'
>> > > > > > DESCRIPTION
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > ENABLED
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > {NAME => 'ADMd5', FAMILIES => [{NAME => 'a', BLOOMFILTER =>
>> > 'NONE',
>> > > > > > REPLICATION_SCOPE => '0', VERSIONS => '3', COMPRESSION => 'NONE',
>> > > > MIN_VER
>> > > > > > true
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > SIONS => '0', TTL => '2147483647', BLOCKSIZE => '65536',
>> IN_MEMORY
>> > > =>
>> > > > > > 'false', BLOCKCACHE => 'true'}]}
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > 1 row(s) in 0.0370 seconds
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > table B:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > hbase(main):003:0> describe 'ADMd5'
>> > > > > > DESCRIPTION
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > ENABLED
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > {NAME => 'ADMd5', FAMILIES => [{NAME => 'a', BLOOMFILTER =>
>> 'ROW',
>> > > > > > REPLICATION_SCOPE => '0', VERSIONS => '1', COMPRESSION =>
>> 'SNAPPY',
>> > > > > MIN_VE
>> > > > > > true
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > RSIONS => '0', TTL => '2147483647', BLOCKSIZE => '65536',
>> > IN_MEMORY
>> > > =>
>> > > > > > 'false', BLOCKCACHE => 'true'}]}
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > 1 row(s) in 0.0280 seconds
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The containing foldersize in hdfs:
>> > > > > > table A:
>> > > > > > sudo -u hdfs hadoop fs -dus -h /a_d
>> > > > > > dus: DEPRECATED: Please use 'du -s' instead.
>> > > > > > 227.4g /a_d
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > table B:
>> > > > > > sudo -u hdfs hadoop fs -dus -h /a_d
>> > > > > > dus: DEPRECATED: Please use 'du -s' instead.
>> > > > > > 501.0g /a_d
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > https://gist.github.com/drocsid/80bba7b6b19d64fde6c2
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
