Thanks for the link, Sean. Ted: What about available memory on the new nodes ? How much larger is it compared to old nodes ?
Cheers On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ted! > > HBase doesn't currently take local node resources into account when > balancing across region servers. There's currently some discussion on > HBASE-11780 about building this funtionality[1]. I'm sure they'd love more > input or details about the scale you'd need to work at. > > > -Sean > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11780 > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Ted Tuttle <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello Ted- >> >> We are considering added new nodes to existing cluster that have higher >> storage capacity than current nodes. We hope, but do not know, that HBase >> would assign more regions to RSs that have more storage capacity. >> >> We are considering 2x storage on new nodes vs current node. >> >> Thanks, >> Ted >> >> From: Ted Yu [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 1:58 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: Development >> Subject: Re: RS storage capacity mismatches >> >> Some clarification: by unequal storage capacity, you are expecting >> certain region servers to host fewer regions, right ? >> >> How big is the difference between memory capacity among the old and new >> servers ? >> >> Cheers >> >> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Ted Tuttle <[email protected]<mailto: >> [email protected]>> wrote: >> Hello- >> >> How does HBase handle region servers with unequal storage capacity? We >> made the original nodes of our cluster a bit light on storage and are >> wondering what would happen is we started adding nodes w/ more storage >> capacity. >> >> Thanks, >> Ted >> >> > > > -- > Sean >
