You may be able to achieve the desired effect by implementing a custom Filter#transformCell(Cell).
-n On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > bq. query in the map-object like the way we query for column values > > Other than storing map-object using multiple columns, I am not aware of > such queries. > > Cheers > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:10 AM, yeshwanth kumar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > hi ted, > > > > i may not need all the key-value pairs, > > is there any way can we query in the map-object like the way we query for > > column values in hbase. > > > > -yeshwanth > > > > Cheers, > > Yeshwanth > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > bq. storing the map object makes task easy. > > > > > > The above makes write(s) easy. But when you query, do you always need > all > > > the key-value pairs in this map object ? > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:38 PM, yeshwanth kumar < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > hi i have a huge map object, which comes from the solr query results. > > > > map contains around 400-500 key-value pairs > > > > > > > > is it a gud way to store the entire map as a value in the column. > > > > is there any particular things like column vaue size, i need to take > > care > > > > of > > > > or shud i store it in different columns with dynamic column names > > > > > > > > storing the map object makes task easy. > > > > but want know,which way is preferable. > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > Yeshwanth > > > > > > > > > >
