We had others report their use earlier (previous thread about removing it). So it is definitely in use. But... I agree it needs to be completed. I know I have been tardy on this and need to speed up. :( Darn work always comes in between.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > Survey: Is anyone using the Thrift 2 interface? > > Not here. > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Kiran Kumar.M.R < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> Our customers were using Hbase-0.94 through thrift1 (C++ clients). > >> Now HBase is getting upgraded to 0.98.x > >> > >> I see that thrift2 development is going on ( > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8818) > >> > > > > It has stalled with quite a while now. > > > > > > > >> Customers are interested in continuing to use thrift1 as they are not > >> interested in new capability given in thrift2 and also minimize their > >> application changes as much as possible. > >> > >> What should be our direction in using thrift interface? > >> > >> - Shall we continue to use thrift1? (Will this continue to be > >> supported, I see some mail threads on making it deprecated) > >> > >> > > IMO this would be safest. > > > > > > > >> - Or suggest our customers to switch to thrift2? > >> > > > > > > Unless anyone is interested in seeing through the thrift2 project to the > > finish, I think we should just purge it from the codebase and stay > thrift1. > > > > St.Ack > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein (via Tom White) >
