Why 32 bit? Because it was a cheaper and more suitable option when we set up the cluster.
Btw. we've added the 64-bit machines to the 32-bit cluster and everything survived - HBase 0.94. Here's a graph showing just disk utilization and the 2 new nodes joining the cluster and gradually taking more data: https://apps.sematext.com/spm-reports/s/J3OBjjK7Xt Otis -- Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/ On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Michael Segel <[email protected]> wrote: > You need to create two sets of Hadoop configurations and deploy them to > the correct nodes. > > Yarn was supposed to be the way to heterogenous clusters. > > > But this begs the question. Why on earth did you have a 32 bit cluster to > begin with? > > On Sep 16, 2014, at 1:13 AM, Esteban Gutierrez <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Yeah, what Andrew said you need to be careful to deploy the right codecs > on > > the right architecture. Otherwise I don't remember any issue mixing RSs > > with 32/64-bit platforms only the heap sizing and some JVM tuning > perhaps. > > > > esteban. > > > > > > -- > > Cloudera, Inc. > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Do we have kind of native compression in PB? > >> > >> Protobufs has its own encodings, the Java language bindings implement > >> them in Java. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Best regards, > >> > >> - Andy > >> > >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > >> Hein (via Tom White) > >> > >
