I see; we're still on 0.98, will verify this once upgrade the hbase; Thanks
for all the info!

2015-05-29 1:02 GMT+08:00 Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]>:

> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:10 AM, ShaoFeng Shi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ted, thanks for giving the link, our scenario is just such a case;
> We're
> > looking forward to see this feature in HBase 1.1; Thanks!
> >
>
> No need to "look forward to" -- 1.1 is released, go give it a spin!
>
> 2015-05-27 22:11 GMT+08:00 Ted Yu <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > Please see
> > >
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/hbase/entry/the_hbase_request_throttling_feature
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:35 AM, ShaoFeng Shi <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Currently we're running a MapReduce over live htables to do table
> merge
> > > > (introduced at
> > https://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book/mapreduce.example.html
> > > );
> > > > At the samtime these tables are still serving user scan requests; As
> > this
> > > > is a full table scan which may take much server resources, we want to
> > > > control the impact to users during the MapReduce, avoding remarkable
> > > > performance downgrade during the MR; I see there are two parameters
> > might
> > > > be related: caching and cacheBlocks, like :
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > scan.setCaching(500);
> > > >
> > > > scan.setCacheBlocks(false);  // don't set to true for MR jobs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > But still want to double check with the experts here, is there other
> > ways
> > > > to control this? Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Shaofeng Shi
> > > > Apache Kylin (incubation)
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to