Hi chen, yes I have customerid column to represent each customers
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Heng Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hm.., is there anything unique like userId to represent one people？ > > > 2015-12-01 16:33 GMT+08:00 Rajeshkumar J <[email protected]>: > > > Is there any other way to store only id becoz there may be new rows with > > the same name like > > > > 1212 | xxxx | 20 > > 1212 | yyyy | 21 > > 1212 | xxxx | 22 > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Heng Chen <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Yeah, if you want to get all records about 1212, just scan rows with > > > prefix 1212 > > > > > > 2015-12-01 16:27 GMT+08:00 Rajeshkumar J <[email protected] > >: > > > > > > > so you want me to design row-key value by appending name column value > > to > > > > the rowkey > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Heng Chen <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > So, why not > > > > > > > > > > 1212-xxx 20 > > > > > 1212-yyy 21 > > > > > 1212-zzz 22 > > > > > > > > > > 2015-12-01 15:33 GMT+08:00 Rajeshkumar J < > > [email protected] > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant like below is this possible > > > > > > > > > > > > Rowkey | column family > > > > > > > > > > > > Name | Age > > > > > > > > > > > > 1212 | xxxx | 20 > > > > > > 1212 | yyyy | 21 > > > > > > 1212 | zzzz | 22 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Heng Chen < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > why not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1212 | 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 27, 28 ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2015-12-01 14:29 GMT+08:00 Rajeshkumar J < > > > > [email protected] > > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ted, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is my use case. I have to store values like this is it > > > > > possible? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RowKey | Values > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1212 | 10,11,12 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1212 | 13, 14, 15 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1212 | 16,27,28 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Ted Yu < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Have you read > > http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#rowkey.design > > > ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bq. we can store more than one row for a row-key value. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you clarify your intention / use case ? If row key is > the > > > > same, > > > > > > key > > > > > > > > > values would be in the same row. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Rajeshkumar J < > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am new to Apache Hbase and I know that in a table > when > > we > > > > try > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > insert > > > > > > > > > > row key value which is already present either new value > is > > > > > > discarded > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > updated. Also I came across row version through which we > > can > > > > > store > > > > > > > > > > different versions of row key based on timestamp. Any one > > > > correct > > > > > > me > > > > > > > > if I > > > > > > > > > > am wrong? Also I need to know is there any way we can > store > > > > more > > > > > > than > > > > > > > > one > > > > > > > > > > row for a row-key value. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
