4.Can same row be in 2 blocks in Hfile. One cell in block 1 and another in
block2 ?

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Shushant Arora <shushantaror...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks!
>
> 1.Will write take lock on all the column families or just the column
> family being affected by write?
>
> 2.How does eviction in LRUBlockcache is implemeted for InMemory or
> multiaccess priority. Say all elements of InMemory priority area(25%) are
> recently used than single and multiaccess area. Now if a new inmemory row
> comes will it evict from inmemory or single access area ?
>
> 3.Why block cache is single per regionserver. Why not single per region.
>
>
> On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Shushant Arora <shushantaror...@gmail.com
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks !
>> >
>> > One doubt regarding locking in memtore :
>> >
>> > Hbase use implicit row lock while applying put operation on a row.
>> >
>> > put(byte[] rowkey).
>> >
>> > when htable.put(p) is fired , regionserver will lock the row but all get
>> > operations will not lock the row and return the row state which was at
>> > state previous to put took lock.
>> >
>> > Memstore is implemented as CSLM so how does it return the row state
>> > previous to put lock when get is fired before put is finished?
>> >
>> >
>> Multiversion Concurrency Control. This is the core class:
>>
>> http://hbase.apache.org/xref/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/MultiVersionConcurrencyControl.html
>> See how it is used in the codebase.
>>
>> Ask more questions if not clear.
>> St.Ack
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Shushant Arora <
>> > shushantaror...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Thanks Stack.
>> > > >
>> > > > 1.So is it at any time there will be two reference 1.active memstore
>> > > > 2.snapshot memstore
>> > > > snapshot will be initialised at time of flush using active memstore
>> > with
>> > > a
>> > > > momentaily lock and then active will be discarded and read will be
>> > served
>> > > > usinmg snapshot and write will go to new active memstore.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > Yes
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > 2key of CSLS is keyvalue . Which part of keyValue is used while
>> sorting
>> > > the
>> > > > set. Is it whole keyvalue or just row key. Does Hfile has separate
>> > entry
>> > > > for each key value and keyvalues of same row key are always stored
>> > > > contiguosly in HFile and may not be in same block?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > Just the row key. Value is not considered in the sort.
>> > >
>> > > Yes, HFile has separate entry for each KeyValue (or 'Cell' in
>> > hbase-speak).
>> > >
>> > > Cells in HFile are sorted. Those of the same or near 'Cell'
>> coordinates
>> > > will be sorted together and may therefore appear inside the same
>> block.
>> > >
>> > > St.Ack
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Shushant Arora <
>> > > > shushantaror...@gmail.com
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Thanks Stack
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > for point 2 :
>> > > > > > I am concerned with downtime of Hbase for read and write.
>> > > > > > If write lock is just for the time while we move aside the
>> current
>> > > > > > MemStore.
>> > > > > > Then when a write happens to key will it update the memstore
>> only
>> > but
>> > > > > > snapshot does not have that update and when snapshot is dunmped
>> to
>> > > > Hfile
>> > > > > > won't we loose the update?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > No. The update is in the new currently active MemStore. The update
>> > will
>> > > > be
>> > > > > included in the next flush added to a new hfile.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > St.Ack
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Shushant Arora <
>> > > > > > shushantaror...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thanks!
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Few doubts;
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > 1.LSM tree comprises two tree-like
>> > > > > > > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_(data_structure)>
>> > > structures,
>> > > > > > called
>> > > > > > > > C0 and
>> > > > > > > > C1 and If the insertion causes the C0 component to exceed a
>> > > certain
>> > > > > > size
>> > > > > > > > threshold, a contiguous segment of entries is removed from
>> C0
>> > and
>> > > > > > merged
>> > > > > > > > into C1 on disk
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > But in Hbase when C0 which is memstore I guess? is exceeded
>> the
>> > > > > > threshold
>> > > > > > > > size its dumped on to HDFS as HFIle(c1 I guess?) - and does
>> > > > > compaction
>> > > > > > is
>> > > > > > > > the process which here means as merging of C0 and C1 ?
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > The 'merge' in the quoted high-level description may just mean
>> > that
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > dumped hfile is 'merged' with the others at read time. Or it
>> may
>> > be
>> > > > as
>> > > > > > > stated, that the 'merge' happens at flush time. Some LSM tree
>> > > > > > > implementations do it this way -- Bigtable, and it calls the
>> > merge
>> > > of
>> > > > > > > memstore and a file-on-disk a form of compaction -- but this
>> is
>> > not
>> > > > > what
>> > > > > > > HBase does; it just dumps the memstore as a flushed hfile.
>> Later,
>> > > > we'll
>> > > > > > run
>> > > > > > > a compaction process to merge hfiles in background.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > 2.Moves current, active Map aside as a snapshot (while a
>> write
>> > > lock
>> > > > > is
>> > > > > > > held
>> > > > > > > > for a short period of time), and then creates a new CSLS
>> > > instances.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > In background, the snapshot is then dumped to disk. We get
>> an
>> > > > > Iterator
>> > > > > > on
>> > > > > > > > CSLS. We write a block at a time. When we exceed configured
>> > block
>> > > > > size,
>> > > > > > > we
>> > > > > > > > start a new one.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > -- Does write lock is held till the time complete CSLS is
>> > dumpled
>> > > > on
>> > > > > > > > disk.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > No. Just while we move aside the current MemStore.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > What is your concern/objective? Are you studying LSM trees
>> > > generally
>> > > > or
>> > > > > > are
>> > > > > > > you worried that HBase is offline for periods of time for read
>> > and
>> > > > > write?
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > St.Ack
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > And read is allowed using snapshot.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thanks!
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Shushant Arora <
>> > > > > > > > shushantaror...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > 1.Does Hbase uses ConcurrentskipListMap(CSLM) to store
>> data
>> > > in
>> > > > > > > > memstore?
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Yes (We use a CSLS but this is implemented over a CSLM).
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > 2.When mwmstore is flushed to HDFS- does it dump the
>> > memstore
>> > > > > > > > > > Concurrentskiplist as Hfile2? Then How does it
>> calculates
>> > > > blocks
>> > > > > > out
>> > > > > > > of
>> > > > > > > > > > CSLM and dmp them in HDFS.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Moves current, active Map aside as a snapshot (while a
>> write
>> > > lock
>> > > > > is
>> > > > > > > held
>> > > > > > > > > for a short period of time), and then creates a new CSLS
>> > > > instances.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > In background, the snapshot is then dumped to disk. We
>> get an
>> > > > > > Iterator
>> > > > > > > on
>> > > > > > > > > CSLS. We write a block at a time. When we exceed
>> configured
>> > > block
>> > > > > > size,
>> > > > > > > > we
>> > > > > > > > > start a new one.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > 3.After dumping the inmemory CSLM of memstore to HFILe
>> does
>> > > > > > memstore
>> > > > > > > > > > content is discarded
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Yes
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > and if while dumping memstore any read request comes
>> > > > > > > > > > will it be responded by copy of memstore or discard of
>> > > memstore
>> > > > > > will
>> > > > > > > be
>> > > > > > > > > > blocked until read request is completed?
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > We will respond using the snapshot until it has been
>> > > > successfully
>> > > > > > > > dumped.
>> > > > > > > > > Once dumped, we'll respond using the hfile.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > No blocking (other than for the short period during which
>> the
>> > > > > > snapshot
>> > > > > > > is
>> > > > > > > > > made and the file is swapped into the read path).
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > 4.When a read request comes does it look in inmemory
>> CSLM
>> > and
>> > > > > then
>> > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > > HFile?
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Generally, yes.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > And what is LogStructuredMerge tree and its usage in
>> Hbase.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Suggest you read up on LSM Trees (
>> > > > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Log-structured_merge-tree)
>> and
>> > > if
>> > > > > you
>> > > > > > > > still
>> > > > > > > > > can't see the LSM tree in the HBase forest, ask specific
>> > > > questions
>> > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > > we'll help you out.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > St.Ack
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Thanks!
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to