On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Natasha d'silva <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response. What about check and put? The check is > atomic but is the put buffered? > No. checkAnd* are operations unto themselves that are sent to the server to run; only it has the means of achieving a checkAnd* that has integrity. St.Ack > On May 16, 2016 6:30 PM, "Stack" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > In 0.98, only Puts are buffered. > > > > I did a search of the above text but didn't find it in 0.98... I'm > > searching wrong? Mind fling an issue so we fix the above > misdocumentation? > > > > Thank you, > > S > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Natasha d'silva <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, I would like some clarification on whether or not disabling > autoflush > > > affects Put and Delete operations or just Puts. > > > The setAutoFlush doc states that it only affects Puts, but elsewhere in > > the > > > documentation for HTable, Puts and Writes are mentioned together: "In > > case > > > of writes (Put, Delete), the underlying write buffer can be corrupted > if > > > multiple threads contend over a single HTable instance." > > > I would appreciate it if someone could please clarify. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > -- > > > -Natasha D'Silva > > > > > >
