I think most folks are looking for javadocs, which vary considerably across minor release lines.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Yu Li <[email protected]> wrote: > >> We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially: >> http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good question >> that shall we supply similar website of different branches for user or >> always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current hbase book >> ( >> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features only for 2.0 >> (plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all users to refer >> to? >> >> btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions later >> than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 ( >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes performance >> regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar >> >> Best Regards, >> Yu >> >> > This is a perennial (... that we should publish per-version doc.) > > Truth be told, we don't do the work to maintain version specific > documentation. RMs usually copy the current state of the master doc into > their branch before cutting an RC so they get the 'latest' changes. Doc is > done up on the master branch. Doc will have callouts if a version-specific > config or feature but we are probably erratic in our practice here (and in > the converse, deprecating the old and no longer supported). > > Doc seems to change at a slow rate so maybe its not so bad that this is the > case. > > That said, if the 1.1 doc has big differences from the master doc., we > could do the same was we did for 0.94 -- making a subdir for 1.1. > > St.Ack > > > > >> On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite often - >> > when building tar balls for cluster testing. >> > >> > In that case, site goal is not used. >> > >> > Cheers >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying from the >> > book >> > > and forgot to remove that execution :) >> > > >> > > >> > > Ted Yu wrote: >> > > >> > >> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed for >> > >> building >> > >> the site. >> > >> >> > >> Cheers >> > >> >> > >> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> > >> Hi, >> > >>> >> > >>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the website. >> > >>> Something similar to the following should build it for you locally. >> > >>> >> > >>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1 >> > >>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site >> > assembly:single` >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> Rajeshkumar J wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>> Hi, >> > >>>> >> > >>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of >> hbase >> > >>>> 0.94 >> > >>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link for >> Api >> > >>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Thanks >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >> >> > >> -- busbey
