Cool! Thanks Josh! I read the section of the guide that supports updates. Thanks again for validating this.
Regards, Denise Sent from mi iPhone > On Nov 11, 2016, at 4:39 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > > Your understanding is incorrect. You can update existing rows :) > > Would encourage you to read through the HBase book that Stack had earlier > sent. It covers simple architecture questions like this. > > http://hbase.apache.org/book.html > > Denise Rogers wrote: >> In reading the material in the link you sent. It seems that you can update >> an existing row through the put command. >> >> I was of the understanding that hbase does not support updates to existing >> rows. >> >> I just need a definitive rule on updates in hbase. >> >> Regards, >> Denise >> >> >> Sent from mi iPhone >> >>> On Nov 11, 2016, at 1:54 PM, Stack<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Link to 1.1. docs is not up. See under 'Documentation and API' tab. See the >>> tail of the menu. Just above the 0.94 item, there is a new 1.1 doc. >>> >>> St.Ack >>> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Stack<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sean Busbey<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I think most folks are looking for javadocs, which vary considerably >>>>> across minor release lines. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Sorry. Yes. Indeed that is what Rajeshkumar asked originally. >>>> >>>> As penance for my derail of the thread, let me work on putting up a link >>>> to 1.1. doc. this evening. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> St.Ack >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Stack<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Yu Li<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We do have an hbase book for 0.94 specially: >>>>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/0.94/book.html, and it might be a good >>>>> question >>>>>>> that shall we supply similar website of different branches for user or >>>>>>> always require them to generate the site by themselves? Current hbase >>>>> book >>>>>>> ( >>>>>>> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html) contains some new features only >>>>> for 2.0 >>>>>>> (plz correct me if I'm wrong) so might not be proper for all users to >>>>> refer >>>>>>> to? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> btw, if plan to use branch-1.1 release, I'd suggest to use versions >>>>> later >>>>>>> than (including) 1.1.4 because of HBASE-14460 ( >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14460, which fixes >>>>> performance >>>>>>> regression), JFYI @Rajeshkumar >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>> Yu >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> This is a perennial (... that we should publish per-version doc.) >>>>>> >>>>>> Truth be told, we don't do the work to maintain version specific >>>>>> documentation. RMs usually copy the current state of the master doc into >>>>>> their branch before cutting an RC so they get the 'latest' changes. Doc >>>>> is >>>>>> done up on the master branch. Doc will have callouts if a >>>>> version-specific >>>>>> config or feature but we are probably erratic in our practice here (and >>>>> in >>>>>> the converse, deprecating the old and no longer supported). >>>>>> >>>>>> Doc seems to change at a slow rate so maybe its not so bad that this is >>>>> the >>>>>> case. >>>>>> >>>>>> That said, if the 1.1 doc has big differences from the master doc., we >>>>>> could do the same was we did for 0.94 -- making a subdir for 1.1. >>>>>> >>>>>> St.Ack >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7 November 2016 at 13:06, Ted Yu<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I actually run the (modified) command in your first email quite >>>>> often - >>>>>>>> when building tar balls for cluster testing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In that case, site goal is not used. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> In hindsight, you're probably right, Ted. I was just copying from >>>>> the >>>>>>>> book >>>>>>>>> and forgot to remove that execution :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ted Yu wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If I am not mistaken, the 'assembly:single' goal is not needed for >>>>>>>>>> building >>>>>>>>>> the site. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe all versions of Javadoc are published on the >>>>> website. >>>>>>>>>>> Something similar to the following should build it for you >>>>> locally. >>>>>>>>>>> 1. git checkout rel/1.1.1 >>>>>>>>>>> 2. `mvn clean install -DskipTests javadoc:aggregate site >>>>>>>> assembly:single` >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Rajeshkumar J wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> We are moving from hbase 0.94 to hbase 1.1.1. Some methods of >>>>>>> hbase >>>>>>>>>>>> 0.94 >>>>>>>>>>>> are deprecated for hbase 1.1.1. So can anyone post me the link >>>>> for >>>>>>> Api >>>>>>>>>>>> documentation for Hbase version 1.1.1 as I can't find that. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> busbey >>>>> >>>> >>
