I have successfully run load-client against an OpenStack cluster running hbase 1.1.2 .
There is still some gap between the buck build and the Makefile build (e.g. load-client and simple-client cannot be built with Makefile) - according to Enis, separate tickets would be opened. Other pending work includes multiput (HBASE-18507). Cheers On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You can follow the structure of simple-client to create your own program. > > > > bq. it is possible compiling my own program without docker and buck? > > > > You can use make. > > > > bq. it is problem with includes <folly/...> > > > > Folly is used heavily by the native client source code. Ultimately your > > native program would include Folly. > > > > > Does the native client work? Is it complete? If not, what is TODO still? > Does it have limitations? If so, what are they? > > Thanks, > S > > > > > > Cheers > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:36 AM, Andrzej <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > W dniu 29.08.2017 o 14:27, Andrzej pisze: > > > > > >> I found simple_client at buck-out/gen/core > > >> no libsasl2 sharted library > > >> > > > > > > libsasl2.so.3 I add symbolic link to libsasl2.so.2 and is ok, > > > buck build number executable like simple-client but I am interested > > > libraries *.a to build my own program using Hbase. > > > There are : > > > libfolly.a > > > libprotobuf.a > > > libif.a > > > libwangle.a > > > libcore.a > > > ..... > > > Which I must use in my own program? it is possible compiling my own > > > program without docker and buck? > > > When I compiling , it is problem with includes <folly/...> which > includes > > > many other files. > > > Is possible crate program which crate/delete tables and its source not > > > included <folly/..> but only link libfolly.a ? > > > > > >
