i think it's time to remove that statement. We have lots of production users running HBase 2 on Hadoop 3 for several years now.
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 6:32 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> wrote: > According to the compatibility matrix, HBase 2.3.4 could work together with > Hadoop 3.2.2. > > And if you just want to connec to HDFS 3.2.2, you could just use the pre > built artifacts for HBase 2.3.4. If you want to use Hadoop 3.2.2 client in > HBase, you need to build the artifacts by your own. > > Thanks. > > hossein ahmadzadeh <h.ahmadzadeh1...@gmail.com> 于2021年3月31日周三 上午3:30写道： > > > <https://stackoverflow.com/posts/66877227/timeline> > > > > The HBase documentation <http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop> noted > > that: > > > > Hadoop 2.x is faster and includes features, such as short-circuit reads > > (See Leveraging local data), which will help improve your HBase random > read > > profile. Hadoop 2.x also includes important bug fixes that will improve > > your overall HBase experience. HBase does not support running with > earlier > > versions of Hadoop. See the table below for requirements specific to > > different HBase versions. *Hadoop 3.x is still in early access releases > and > > has not yet been sufficiently tested by the HBase community for > production > > use cases.* > > > > But right next to this point in the compatibility table says that HBase > > 2.3.4 is fully functional with Hadoop 3.2.2. So I got confused about > > whether We can use HBase 2.3.4 in production alongside Hadoop 3.2.2 or > not? > > > > Best Regards. > > >
