Hi,

I see there are two issues

1. We are adding listeners twice, as jason mentioned the duplicate init
will be filtered but we will be processing the callbacks twice. While this
wont be a problem since multiple listeners wont be concurrently invoked, it
might impact performance slightly.
2. Since we add the listeners (generichelixcontroller) automatically, that
means users cant really add there own customized listeners.

In our recipes we do something similar to what Vinayak posted. Is there any
reason why we add the listeners automatically when helixcontroller joins
the cluster. Does this mean that we will setup watches even if the
controller does not become leader.

thanks,
Kishore G











On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Zhen Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Vinayak, we will definitely fix the problem, but the duplicate Init
> will be filtered by CallbackHandler, so your custom listener will not be
> invoked by multiple init callbacks. May I know what strange behavior you
> are worrying about?
>
> thanks,
> jason
>  On Jan 26, 2014 1:47 PM, "Vinayak Borkar" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Kanak,
>>
>> I do agree that instantiating my own GenericHelixController is not
>> required. However, I will need to instantiate my own controller in its
>> place if I would like custom controller behavior and then this issue could
>> lead to strange behavior.
>>
>> Vinayak
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/26/14, 1:36 PM, Kanak Biscuitwala wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Vinayak,
>>>
>>> Looking at the code, here are a couple notes:
>>>
>>> 1. Instantiating your own GenericHelixController is unnecessary as the
>>> Helix manager already does this.
>>> 2. Even considering #1, you're right: there are still repeat callbacks.
>>>
>>> Here are the tracebacks I generated: https://gist.github.com/
>>> kanakb/8639730
>>>
>>> The sequence is:
>>>
>>> 1. ZKHelixManager#handleNewSession() calls
>>> handleNewSessionAsController()
>>> 1. handleNewSessionAsController adds a controller callback for leader
>>> election
>>> 2. CallbackHandler calls init on that controller callback
>>> 3. The controller callback adds all other callbacks, resulting in init
>>> being called for each
>>> 4. ZKHelixManager#handleNewSession calls initHandlers()
>>> 5. initHandlers() iterates over all currently registered callbacks and
>>> calls init() on them
>>> 6. CallbackHandler knows it's already received an init, so it simply
>>> returns without doing anything on those callbacks
>>>
>>> So yes, we do have repeat callback initializations for the controller
>>> and it should be possible to avoid the double inits. These are, however,
>>> harmless and inexpensive.
>>>
>>> Kanak
>>>
>>>  > Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 12:13:16 -0800
>>>  > From: [email protected]
>>>  > To: [email protected]
>>>  > Subject: Duplicate INIT in Controller
>>>  >
>>>  > Hi,
>>>  >
>>>  > I am observing duplicate handlers being added to the controller and
>>> this
>>>  > is leading to INIT being called multiple times on the same handlers.
>>>  >
>>>  > Here is my code to start the controler, which looks fairly standard:
>>>  >
>>>  > @Override
>>>  > protected void doStart() throws SystemException {
>>>  > hManager = HelixManagerFactory.getZKHelixManager(clusterName,
>>>  > UUID.randomUUID().toString(),
>>>  > InstanceType.CONTROLLER, zkAddr);
>>>  > try {
>>>  > hManager.connect();
>>>  > } catch (Exception e) {
>>>  > throw new SystemException(e);
>>>  > }
>>>  > GenericHelixController controller = new GenericHelixController();
>>>  > HelixControllerMain.addListenersToController(hManager, controller);
>>>  > }
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  > Here are the log messages due to duplicate calls:
>>>  >
>>>  > 2014-01-26 12:11:16,721 WARN [CallbackHandler] Skip processing
>>>  > callbacks for listener:
>>>  > org.apache.helix.messaging.handling.HelixTaskExecutor@7f3076b2, path:
>>>  > /e78dead7-0c2f-4c5f-af7e-f25e8c170db1/CONTROLLER/MESSAGES, expected
>>>  > types: [CALLBACK, FINALIZE] but was INIT
>>>  > 2014-01-26 12:11:16,721 WARN [CallbackHandler] Skip processing
>>>  > callbacks for listener:
>>>  > org.apache.helix.controller.GenericHelixController@4db4bfda, path:
>>>  > /e78dead7-0c2f-4c5f-af7e-f25e8c170db1/CONFIGS/PARTICIPANT, expected
>>>  > types: [CALLBACK, FINALIZE] but was INIT
>>>  > 2014-01-26 12:11:16,721 WARN [CallbackHandler] Skip processing
>>>  > callbacks for listener:
>>>  > org.apache.helix.controller.GenericHelixController@4db4bfda, path:
>>>  > /e78dead7-0c2f-4c5f-af7e-f25e8c170db1/LIVEINSTANCES, expected types:
>>>  > [CALLBACK, FINALIZE] but was INIT
>>>  > 2014-01-26 12:11:16,721 WARN [CallbackHandler] Skip processing
>>>  > callbacks for listener:
>>>  > org.apache.helix.controller.GenericHelixController@4db4bfda, path:
>>>  > /e78dead7-0c2f-4c5f-af7e-f25e8c170db1/IDEALSTATES, expected types:
>>>  > [CALLBACK, FINALIZE] but was INIT
>>>  > 2014-01-26 12:11:16,721 WARN [CallbackHandler] Skip processing
>>>  > callbacks for listener:
>>>  > org.apache.helix.controller.GenericHelixController@4db4bfda, path:
>>>  > /e78dead7-0c2f-4c5f-af7e-f25e8c170db1/CONTROLLER, expected types:
>>>  > [CALLBACK, FINALIZE] but was INIT
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  > Thanks,
>>>  > Vinayak
>>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to