Thank you, that makes a lot of sense. I will stick with 1.0.1 then. The pending issue I linked is not something PR-able (I don't think) since it has to do with the published binary release, but if I encounter anything else I will certainly consider creating a PR. Thanks again!
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 3:57 PM Xue Junkai <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Brent! I would suggest you to use 1.0.1 instead of using 0.9.x... > Here're the two reasons: > 1. 0.9.x releases are maintaining releases for the ones not upgrading to > 1.0+. There will only be on demand / critical fixes. If you need > advanced features, such as WAGED and other developing features. You have to > bump up your version finally > 2. 1.0+ versions have backward incompatible changes compared to 0.9.x. If > you started with 0.9.x, you have to refactor your codebase once you decide > to bump the version up to 1.0+ to use new features. > > For the pending issues, if you are interested, feel free to investigate it > and submit PRs to Helix. We would like to see more and more people > contributing to Helix! > > Best, > > Junkai > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 3:48 PM Brent <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> For a new project, what's the recommended version of Apache Helix to use? >> >> I had originally been experimenting with 1.0.1, but between the recent >> releases of 0.9.8 and 0.9.9 as well as some pending 1.0.1 issues (e.g. >> https://github.com/apache/helix/issues/1387), I'm wonder if I should be >> on the latest 0.9.x version instead. Thoughts? >> >> Thanks! >> >
