Under 'Code change', 'Binding votes says Lazy approval (not counting the vote of the contributor)
But Lazy Approval says it's an action that that is implicitly allowed except for -1. I guess the Code change rule wants to say one +1 is required - but that's not very clear. Maybe Lazy Approval wants to say at least 1 +1 required other than contributor/person in question? ________________________________ From: Carl Steinbach [mailto:c...@cloudera.com] Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 3:35 PM To: user@hive.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive Project "Decisions regarding the project are made by votes on the primary project development mailing list (user@hive.apache.org<mailto:u...@pig.apache.org>). Where necessary, PMC voting may take place on the private Hive PMC mailing list." It would be good if the "Actions" table included a column specifying which mailing list each type of vote should occur on. Also, at the first contributors meeting there was a discussion about the process for becoming a committer and whether or not people would be notified that they have been nominated, and hence know if they're nomination was later rejected. If these votes are going to take place on the PMC list I think it's important for this provision to appear in the bylaws. Thanks. Carl On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Ning Zhang <nzh...@facebook.com<mailto:nzh...@facebook.com>> wrote: +1 On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: Hi Folks, I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive Project https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws that were recently proposed by Alan Gates. We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these bylaws to pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All Pig users, contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though only PMC votes will be binding. +1 from me.. Ashish
