Yes, it's known issue (HIVE-6758) that beeline -f  works differently when
running  in background. A workaround is noted in the JIRA.

--Xuefu


On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Bogala, Chandra Reddy <
chandra.bog...@gs.com> wrote:

> I submit 5 queries from 5 different scripts.  When I use hive cli, I could
> see all these 5 queries related jobs in application tracker in different
> states ( running/accepted etc). When I submit through beeline only one job
> I see in application tracker. Other job I can see only after first job
> finishes.
>
>
>
> Ex: hive –f script1.hql &
>
>       Hive –f script2.hql &
>
>       Hive –f script3.hql &
>
>       Hive –f script4.hql &
>
>       Hive –f script5.hql &
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Xuefu Zhang [mailto:xzh...@cloudera.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, July 11, 2014 7:29 PM
> *To:* user@hive.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: beeline client
>
>
>
> Chaudra,
>
> The difference you saw between Hive CLI and Beeline might indicate a bug.
> However, before making such a conclusion, could you give an example of your
> queries? Are the jobs you expect to run parallel for a single query? Please
> note that your script file is executed line by line in either case.
>
> --Xuefu
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Bogala, Chandra Reddy <
> chandra.bog...@gs.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>    Currently I am submitting multiple hive jobs using hive cli with “hive
> –f” from different scripts. All these jobs I could see in application
> tracker and these get processed in parallel.
>
> Now I planned to switch to HiveServer2 and submitting jobs using beeline
> client from multiple scripts  example : “nohup beeline -u
> jdbc:hive2://<host>:<port>#<variable>=$epoch -n <user> -p <pass> -d
> org.apache.hive.jdbc.HiveDriver -f <hql script>.hql &”.
>
> But I could see jobs get submitted in serial. Only one job appears in
> application tracker at a time even though cluster resources are available.
> Once that job finishes then only other job get submitted. Why is that? Is
> there any setting needs to be set to submit jobs in parallel?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chandra
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to