javadevmtl wrote > Yeah it's perforamance is crazy. I hadn't experienced any "buggy" issues > when i tried. it also has off-heap otion now also. But I find the concept > of O(1) indexes very interesting...
I think that O(1) is achievable only for hash indexes and therefore can be used only for equality queries. This is a very rare case in SQL and can barely be treated as a replacement of tree indexes. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Btw-anyone-heard-of-CQ-engine-tp1421p1425.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
