Hi Sridhar, Please properly subscribe to the user list by sending an email to "[email protected]" and following the instructions in the reply. This way everyone in the community will get notified whenever you post questions.
sridhar77 wrote > Since it has just come under ASF, I want to know how many companies are > using Apache Ignite. Ignite has been in Apache for over a year already, and prior to that it was part of GridGain open source edition for over 5 years. It is definitely a mature codebase with 100s of customers around the world using it in production, including some very large well known banks. sridhar77 wrote > I am also not sure if we will get any enterprise support features if we > use it. Currently, GridGain is probably the main company providing enterprise-level support as well as additional enterprise features for Apache Ignite. sridhar77 wrote > Is it just for small companies or can it be used in production too by > medium to large companies. As I mentioned above, Ignite is being used by many large customers, including some very large banks. In many installations Ignite is replacing products like Oracle Coherence, Pivotal Gemfire, IBM ExtremeScale, etc. sridhar77 wrote > Also, I want to know how it differs from Apache Cassandra in its > implementation, because I heard Cassandra is faster for both Read and > Write. Ignite is an in-memory data grid providing in-memory key-value data storage partitioned across the cluster, while Cassandra is mainly a disk-based system. Performance-wise, Ignite should be an order of magnitude faster than Cassandra. Unlike Cassandra, Ignite provides fully-ACID fault-tolerant transactions within the cluster. Ignite also provides ANSI-99 SQL querying capability, including distributed joins, across the clustered data. -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Can-Apache-Ignite-be-used-in-production-Environment-tp1617p1627.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
