On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Alexey Goncharuk < [email protected]> wrote:
> Even if swap and store is disabled, a miss on a backup node will result in > a network trip to primary node because an entry could have been evicted > from the cache. > Alexey, we are talking about a REPLICATED cache. I do not understand why do we ever need to fetch the data from remote nodes on a cache miss, if evictions and expirations are disabled, like described here? It should be a local lookup only in this case, no? > >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Performance-issue-with-REPLICATED-cache-tp1710p1730.html >>>> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>> >>> >> >
