Yes, I thought the same. Looks like I didn't understand how FUSE works when answering.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:13 PM, vkulichenko <[email protected] > wrote: > Vladimir Ozerov wrote > > Some time ago there was a discussion to implement native IGFS -> OS > > adapter > > [2], but no final decisions were made. As were are seing growing interest > > to this feature probably we should resume this thread. > > Vladimir, > > I think Kobe and Paolo are looking for the opposite to what we were going > to > achieve with Fuse. In my understanding, they just need an implementation of > IgfsSecondaryFileSystem based on java.io.File API instead of Hadoop. Am I > missing something? > > -Val > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/IGFS-backed-by-persistence-on-physical-filesystem-tp1882p1970.html > Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
