What about creating a cache with parameter <String, Long> with keys being the name of the sequences, that is itself persisted with a CacheStore implementation?
On 2/3/16, 4:23 PM, "Steve Scheck" <[email protected]> wrote: >I’m trying to migrate some tables that reside in a relational DB into Ignite >caches with write-behind persistence. The cache keys will correspond to >sequence columns from the former relational schema. So I need a way to >generate unique sequence numbers. > >Thanks. > > > > > >On 2/3/16, 4:08 PM, "vkulichenko" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Hi Steve, >> >>The atomic sequence can't be persisted. Can you describe what's your use >>case and what you're trying to achieve? >> >>-Val >> >> >> >>-- >>View this message in context: >>http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/IgniteAtomicSequence-persistence-tp2826p2827.html >>Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
