Ah, I realise now that this FAQ you are talking about is probably more of a dev one where as the one I’ve created is more product focused.
Christos > On 11 Mar 2016, at 18:20, Christos Erotocritou <chris...@gridgain.com> wrote: > > We already have a basic FAQ page which I am populating: > http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/docs/faq > <http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/docs/faq> > > Please feel free to add to it. > > Not sure if we want to migrate this to the wiki? > > Christos > >> On 11 Mar 2016, at 17:35, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org >> <mailto:dsetrak...@apache.org>> wrote: >> >> +1 on FAQ >> >> Can we just create a page, and start populating it? >> >> D. >> >> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com >> <mailto:avinogra...@gridgain.com>> >> wrote: >> >>> Yakov, >>> >>> I've answered. >>> Seems we have to have special FAQ section at Ignite wiki to publish same >>> things. >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org >>> <mailto:yzhda...@apache.org>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Vlad and all (esp Val and Anton V.), >>>> >>>> I reviewed the PR. My comments are in the ticket. >>>> >>>> Anton V. there is a question regarding optimized-classnames.properties. >>>> Can you please respond in ticket? >>>> >>>> >>>> --Yakov >>>> >>>> 2016-02-29 16:00 GMT+06:00 Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org >>>> <mailto:yzhda...@apache.org>>: >>>> >>>>> Vlad, that's great! I will take a look this week. Reassigning ticket to >>>>> myself. >>>>> >>>>> --Yakov >>>>> >>>>> 2016-02-26 18:37 GMT+03:00 Vladisav Jelisavcic <vladis...@gmail.com >>>>> <mailto:vladis...@gmail.com>>: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> i recently implemented distributed ReentrantLock - IGNITE-642, >>>>>> i made a pull request, so hopefully this could be added to the next >>>>>> release. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> Vladisav >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Alexey Goncharuk < >>>>>> alexey.goncha...@gmail.com <mailto:alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The current implementation of IgniteCache.lock(key).lock() has the >>>>>> same >>>>>>> semantics as the transactional locks - cache topology cannot be >>>>>> changed >>>>>>> while there exists an ongoing transaction or an explicit lock is >>>>>> held. The >>>>>>> restriction for transactions is quite fundamental, the lock() issue >>>>>> can be >>>>>>> fixed if we re-implement locking the same way IgniteSemaphore >>>>>> currently >>>>>>> works. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As for the "Failed to find semaphore with the given name" message, my >>>>>> first >>>>>>> guess is that DataStructures were configured with 1 backups which led >>>>>> to >>>>>>> the data loss when two nodes were stopped. Mario, can you please >>>>>> re-test >>>>>>> your semaphore scenario with 2 backups configured for data structures? >>>>>>> From my side, I can also take a look at the semaphore issue when I'm >>>>>> done >>>>>>> with IGNITE-2610. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >
