Sorry, my mistake. I realized it was a networking issue. Its fixed now.
What ports should I be whitelisting for the setup to work in a firewall?

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:33 AM, babu prasad <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thank you!
> Here is the configuration.
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>
> <!--
>             Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
> more
>   contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
>   this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
>   The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
>   (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
>   the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
>
>        http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>
>   Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
>   distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
>   WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
>   See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
>   limitations under the License.
> -->
>
> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
>        xmlns:util="http://www.springframework.org/schema/util";
>        xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
>        xsi:schemaLocation="
>        http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
>        http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
>        http://www.springframework.org/schema/util
>        http://www.springframework.org/schema/util/spring-util.xsd";>
>     <!--
>                           Alter configuration below as needed.
>     -->
>   <bean id="grid.cfg"
> class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.IgniteConfiguration">
>     <property name="cacheConfiguration">
>       <list>
>         <bean class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.CacheConfiguration">
>           <property name="name" value="IgniteCache"/>
>       <property name="cacheMode" value="PARTITIONED"/>
>           <property name="atomicWriteOrderMode" value="PRIMARY"/>
>           <property name="writeSynchronizationMode" value="PRIMARY_SYNC"/>
>         <property name="evictionPolicy">
>           <bean
> class="org.apache.ignite.cache.eviction.lru.LruEvictionPolicy">
>             <property name="maxSize" value="100000000"/>
>         </bean>
>       </property>
>       <property name="swapEnabled" value="false"/>
>     <property name="atomicityMode" value="ATOMIC" />
>     <property name="backups" value="1" />
>     </bean>
>  </list>
> </property>
> <property name="discoverySpi">
>         <bean class="org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.TcpDiscoverySpi">
>           <property name="ipFinder">
>             <bean
> class="org.apache.ignite.spi.discovery.tcp.ipfinder.vm.TcpDiscoveryVmIpFinder">
>               <property name="addresses">
>                 <list>
>                   <value>127.0.0.1:47500..47509</value>
>             <!---      <value><public Elastic IP>:47500..47509</value> -->
>                 </list>
>               </property>
>              </bean>
>           </property>
>         </bean>
>     </property>
>     <property name="communicationSpi">
>     <bean
> class="org.apache.ignite.spi.communication.tcp.TcpCommunicationSpi">
>       <property name="slowClientQueueLimit" value="1000"/>
>     </bean>
>   </property>
>   </bean>
>   </beans>
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Looks like a kind of misconfiguration or networking problem. Please
>> provide XML configuration you used to build the cluster.
>>
>> Vladimir.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:29 AM, babu prasad <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am trying to automate ignite cluster build.
>>> I am using apache-ignite-fabric-1.5.0.final-bin.zip.
>>> Looks like the nodes are starting up as individual nodes and not as part
>>> of the cluster.
>>>
>>> I tried using both the AWS configuration(using S3) and static IP and I
>>> am still running into the issue where the nodes are not discovered as part
>>> of the cluster.
>>>
>>> Could something be broken?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> -Babu
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to