Hi Andres,

Scan query with partition number was created exactly to iterate over
partitions. Please share your numbers for scan query and local iteration.
For now I do not see any obvious reason why it could be much slower than
iteration.

Vladimir.

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:03 AM, abarbaro <[email protected]> wrote:

> A couple of things to clarify the request/question about an API to iterate
> over cache entries on given partitions:
>    a) I'm only talking about iterating locally (i.e. it will only iterate
> on
> the localEntries).
>    b) In terms of semantics, I was thinking about overload for the existing
> localEntries method
>              for (Entry<K, V> entry :
> Ignition.localIgnite().cache(cacheName).localEntries(partitions,
> CachePeekMode.PRIMARY))
>
>        where partitions is an int[] that contains the partitions to iterate
> over.
>
>
> I'm not suggesting an implementation, but simply trying to clarify my
> previous comment.
>
> Andres
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Ignite-Cache-and-Compute-Performance-tp3722p3752.html
> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Reply via email to