Jan, As far as I know, one should use only annotations or only configuration approach for one type.
>From my point of view, it is better to use one approach for all types and not mix them. On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:24 PM, jan.swaelens <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > No the ones listed are all the regular ones (PK, FK indexes from the auto > generated code), I execute 'SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.INDEXES' to > list them. > > I tried adding them in the 'CacheConfig' class I am using to define the > caches and then they seem to appear. I will add the other ones based on the > config you provided and come back with the results. > > Does this mean that the 'CacheConfig' approach is not compatible with the > annotations, or are the annotations not working for some reason? > > br > jan > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Unexpected-performance-issue-with-SQL-query-followed-by-error-tp4726p5296.html > Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Alexey Kuznetsov GridGain Systems www.gridgain.com
