Hi Alexei, I wanted to get back to you on this. Thank you for the detailed examples, they did help.
Based on your recommendation, I ended up using the first approach where a type field was added and then a different field stores the value depending on the type of data that is stored. This design makes things harder, particularly in multi-model situations, because I cannot easily wrap the fact that the data might be in any of several fields in the "bean" stored in the cache. But it does work. -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Using-SQL-to-query-Object-field-stored-in-Cache-tp5005p5345.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
