Thanks for the response. At our peak we could have around 1000 documents cached. We can go with a cache per document design or a design with one named cache and add the document to the cache along with a nested hash map representing the pages.
IgniteCache<String(doc Id), HashMap<String (Page#), ImagePage>> Are there any performance considerations between a cache per document or one cache with a nested HashMap? Based on your previous response at peak it looks like we could be adding 2 gig of heap space by going with a Cache Per Document design. So memory utilization would be lower with the one named cache approach just was wondering if there are any performance considerations between the two approaches -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Overall-desgn-question-tp7459p7488.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
