Sorry for late answer. Common performance tip described in [1] and [2]. Do you have all your ignite nodes on single machine? Do you use any Virtual Environment like VmWare ESX? Ignite running inside VM can have some performance issues.
Also I've notice from screenshot you provide: - almost half of spap space is used. Is it used by Ignite? - eth0 shows 798 Mbps incoming data rate, that ~ 200k msg per sec (for 500 bytes messages). Does it maximum speed? How does is changing while you adding new nodes? - lo0 shown 1Gbps. It looks like Ignite inter-nodes communication. Is it possible to apply partition-aware data loading [3] to your test? Please, correct me if I missed smth. Grid and cache configuration and JFR profiling results [4] may be helpful. [1] http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/docs/performance-tips [2] http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/docs/jvm-and-system-tuning [3] http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/docs/data-loading#ignitedatastreamer [4] http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/docs/jvm-and-system-tuning#section-detailed-garbage-collection-stats On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 5:36 PM, rishi007bansod <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > In my case CPU is becoming bottleneck when 2 nodes are connected, I > have > attached my atop command snapshot, > <http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/file/n10675/atop_log.png> > I have not set number of backups parameter, it is default(i.e. 0) in my > case. Is there any way I can improve performance? Which ignite parameters > or > system parameters should I look for? Are there any settings that I should > look for when 2 or more nodes are connected in grid? As in my case data > loading rate is not scaling up with 2 nodes connected > > Thanks. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users. > 70518.x6.nabble.com/Get-high-throughput-for-loading-data- > in-ignite-tp10483p10675.html > Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Best regards, Andrey V. Mashenkov
