Hi, it still doesn't describe your use case in details. How exactly do you use Ignite cache in your system? What kind of data do you cache and what source of this data in case without Ignite?
Also it looks strange for me that you try to create near cache with name that doesn't match with original cache name. This code should fail at runtime. On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:49 AM, nragon <[email protected]> wrote: > Starting with ignite: > - 4 nodes managed by yarn > - Node configurations are as above > - 3 off heap caches with one record each > > Flink: > - 5 task managers with 2 slots each and 2gb > > In my current job I'm reading from kafka, mapping some business rules with > flink map functions and sink to hbase. This job without ignite cache > processes 30k/s events. When I add ignite on flink map function to enrich > data with cache.get(key) the performance drops to 2k/s. > I'm bypassing data enrichment at first test(30k/s, just assigning a random > value) > Near cache should pull the one record from cache and from there it should be > really quick right? > Just wondering if the configurations above are the correct oned for fast > lookup caches. > > Thanks > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Client-near-cache-with-Apache-Flink-tp11627p11636.html > Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
