Hi, The page [1] contains also workaround for IN operation. You can use JOIN instead of IN.
Sergi, Will this tip actual for 2.0 version yet? 1. https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/sql-performance-and- debugging#sql-performance-and-usability-considerations On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 1:50 PM, kmandalas < [email protected]> wrote: > After investigation more I run into the following: > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/sql-performance-and- > debugging#sql-performance-and-usability-considerations > > So, cause my query has IN clause no indexing will be used anyway. > > Could you please elaborate more on this topic and if/what will change at > version 2.0? Should I open a different topic better? > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users. > 70518.x6.nabble.com/Distributed-Closures-VS-Executor-Service- > tp11192p12314.html > Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
