Dmitry,
Is is not quite correct to compare Ignite vs Postgre in this
configuration: Apache Ignite is distributed system and you can't feel
it's advantages in one-node configuration.
04/10/2017 14:32, Dmitry Pryakhin пишет:
Dear colleagues,
I consider using Ignite, and now do some testing. Cache performance test has
shown ridiculously low performance. Same test was done against PostgreSQL on
the same computer, with much better result. Now I'm trying to figure out if
it's supposed to work that way, or maybe I've done something wrong. Could
anyone verify my tesging approach and configuration? Details are below.
Task: insert 10000 items; keys and values are strings.
Environment: Intel, Windows, Oracle JRE 1.8.
Configuration 1: Ignite 2.2, 1 server node and 1 client node deployed on the
same computer, both have default configuration. In-memory cache.
Average execution time = 1.95 sec.
Configuration 2: Ignite 2.2, 1 server node and 1 client node, deployed on
the same computer. A persistent cache was set up in the server configuration
file.
Best execution time = 510 sec.
Configuration 3: PosgtreSQL, deployed on the same computer as the client.
Average execution time = 3 sec.
Server configuration file for configuration 2:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:schemaLocation="
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd";>
<bean id="grid.cfg"
class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.IgniteConfiguration">
<property name="persistentStoreConfiguration">
<bean
class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.PersistentStoreConfiguration"/>
</property>
<property name="cacheConfiguration">
<bean
class="org.apache.ignite.configuration.CacheConfiguration">
<property name="name" value="CacheOne"/>
</bean>
</property>
</bean>
</beans>
Client code:
public class PopulateMap {
private static final char[] LETTERS = {'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f',
'g',
'h', 'i', 'j', 'k', 'l', 'm', 'n', 'o', 'p', 'q', 'r', 's', 't', 'u', 'x',
'y', 'z'};
private static final int L_SIZE = LETTERS.length;
public static void main(String argv[]) throws Exception {
Ignition.setClientMode(true);
int idx0 = 0, idx1 = 0, idx2 = 0;
StringBuilder bf = new StringBuilder();
try (Ignite ignite = Ignition.start("default-config.xml")) {
ignite.active(true);
CacheConfiguration<String, String> cacheConf = new
CacheConfiguration<>("CacheOne");
Cache<String, String> cache =
ignite.getOrCreateCache(cacheConf);
cache.clear();
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 1; i <= 10000; i++) {
bf.setLength(0);
bf.append(LETTERS[idx0]).append(LETTERS[idx1]).append(LETTERS[idx2]);
if (++idx2 == L_SIZE) {
idx2 = 0;
if (++idx1 == L_SIZE) {
idx1 = 0;
if (++idx0 == L_SIZE) {
idx0 = 0;
}
}
}
cache.put(String.valueOf(i), bf.toString());
}
long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("=== Execution time is " + (end - start) +
" ms.");
}
}
}
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
--
Regards, Konstantin.
