I made the changes to store cache items as byte[] instead of MemoryStream which has reduced the overall storage requirement by around 30%, which is a nice result 😊
Thanks! Raymond. *From:* Raymond Wilson [mailto:[email protected]] *Sent:* Tuesday, October 17, 2017 12:22 AM *To:* '[email protected]' <[email protected]> *Subject:* RE: Error with ScanQuery Hi Pavel, Thanks for the tips on MemoryStream versus byte[]. I’ll look into it. Thanks, Raymond. *From:* Pavel Tupitsyn [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *Sent:* Monday, October 16, 2017 11:00 PM *To:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: Error with ScanQuery Hi Raymond, 1) Please attach full exception details, including all inner exceptions (can be obtained with ex.ToString()) 2) Storing MemoryStream in cache is not a very good idea: there is a lot of unnecessary overhead (underlying buffer is usually bigger that real data, there is some state, etc). Consider storing byte[] instead (call MemoryStream.ToArray()). Thanks, Pavel On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Raymond Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: I can do that tomorrow. In the meantime, can you speak to what that error means? Thanks, Raymond. Sent from my iPhone > On 16/10/2017, at 9:18 PM, dkarachentsev <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Raymond, > > Could you please attach full log and config for failed node? > > Thanks! > -Dmitry > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
