I would disagree with you that it doesn’t make sense to re-run benchmarks. Vendors usually publish artificial benchmarks that has nothing to do with a specific use case and environment. A rule of thumb is to benchmark your data model and use case.
Anyway, those benchmarks were executed by GridGain so direct all the question to that company. BTW, these results [1] were received after that allegation of Hazelcast discussed in the links provided by you. [1] http://dmagda.blogspot.com/2017/04/benchmarking-apache-ignite-still-keeps.html <http://dmagda.blogspot.com/2017/04/benchmarking-apache-ignite-still-keeps.html> — Denis > On Dec 20, 2017, at 12:27 PM, Dmitri Bronnikov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > If 3-rd party runs benchmark even better. It doesn't make sense if everyone > in the world has to run the same benchmarks. Division of labor makes sense. > > Here's what I meant w.r.t. comparison vs Hazelcast. > > https://www.gridgain.com/resources/blog/gridgain-confirms-apache-ignite-performance-2x-faster-hazelcast > https://blog.hazelcast.com/fake-benchmark/ > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
