Yes, correct object is stored as byte array
As my attribute name is not fixed.
I want to have index on different attributes which is not directly visible
as the pojo instance variable

Rajesh

On 19 Jan 2018 3:56 a.m., "vkulichenko" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Rajesh,
>
> It's not clear what you're trying to achieve. So are you going to store the
> attributes as a map or in serialized form as a byte array? And what exactly
> should be indexed?
>
> -Val
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
>

Reply via email to