Cache interceptors are not available in Ignite.NET and there are no plans to add them.
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:37 PM, Raymond Wilson <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi Dmitriy, > > > > My question regarding cache interceptor availability in .Net is still > outstanding. > > > > I have working code using a continuous query, but am interested in cache > interceptor if this is a better solution. > > > > Thanks. > > Raymond. > > > > *From:* Dmitry Pavlov [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 16, 2018 3:45 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Cc:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: Using a cache as an affinity co-located processing buffer > in Ignite.Net > > > > Hi Raymond, > > > > Was this question answered? > > > > Sincerely, > > Dmitriy Pavlov > > > > вт, 1 мая 2018 г. в 0:20, Raymond Wilson <[email protected]>: > > Cross posting to dev list for comment on cache interceptor availability on > Ignite .Net client. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Raymond Wilson [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2018 10:35 PM > To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: Using a cache as an affinity co-located processing buffer in > Ignite.Net > > Further investigation shows CacheInterceptor is not a part of the > Ignite.NET API. > > Is there a plan/ticket for this to be done? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Raymond Wilson [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2018 1:08 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Using a cache as an affinity co-located processing buffer in > Ignite.Net > > Val, > > Are the interceptors invoked in the affinity co-located context of the > item? The help is a little unclear on that. > > Thanks, > Raymond. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 28/04/2018, at 12:12 PM, vkulichenko <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Raymond, > > > > If you go with approach I described above, I would actually recommend to > use > > interceptors: > > > https://ignite.apache.org/releases/latest/javadoc/org/apache/ignite/cache/ > CacheInterceptor.html > > > > Continuous query seems to be a bit cumbersome for this. > > > > -Val > > > > > > > > -- > > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/ > >
