Hi, Have you tried Thin Client mode? https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs/thin-client
Pavel On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 2:13 PM, F. D. <free.devel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Igor, > > it's almost the same. I'm considering startup + connection. I'm using > Ignite 2.4. The node excel is only client, and I have only a server node > on an other machine in my organization, and I cannot see particular > activity of cpu or network. > > Thanks, > F.D. > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:00 AM Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Try using "TcpDiscoveryStaticIpFinder" instead of >> "TcpDiscoveryMulticastIpFinder". >> >> Does it take 1 min for connection only or for start up + connection? >> >> Best Regards, >> Igor >> >> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:45 AM, F. D. <free.devel...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying to use Ignite to develop an internal system of data >>> contribution. To do this, I'm launching Ignite inside Excel, and I'm using >>> the C# binding. >>> >>> When try to connect it consumes a lot of time (~1 min.), this is my >>> simple app.config: >>> >>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> >>> <configuration> >>> <configSections> >>> <section name="igniteConfiguration" >>> type="Apache.Ignite.Core.IgniteConfigurationSection, >>> Apache.Ignite.Core"/> >>> </configSections> >>> >>> <runtime> >>> <gcServer enabled="false"/> >>> </runtime> >>> >>> <igniteConfiguration xmlns="http://ignite.apache.org/schema/dotnet/ >>> IgniteConfigurationSection" localhost="10.200.30.100" >>> peerAssemblyLoadingMode="CurrentAppDomain" gridName="IMIStreamer"> >>> <cacheConfiguration> >>> <cacheConfiguration name="generic"/> >>> </cacheConfiguration> >>> >>> <atomicConfiguration atomicSequenceReserveSize="0"/> >>> >>> <discoverySpi type="TcpDiscoverySpi"> >>> <ipFinder type="TcpDiscoveryMulticastIpFinder"> >>> <endpoints> >>> <string>10.200.20.90:47500..47509</string> >>> </endpoints> >>> </ipFinder> >>> </discoverySpi> >>> </igniteConfiguration> >>> >>> <startup> >>> <supportedRuntime version="v4.0" sku=".NETFramework,Version=v4. >>> 5.2"/> >>> </startup> >>> >>> </configuration> >>> >>> Is it possibile to reduce this time of connection? >>> I've tried to use the thin client, but in this client there's no >>> continuous query (and need it, because I want to be reactive when a cache >>> change). >>> >>> Thanks in advance for your help, >>> F.D. >>> >>> >>
