Thanks. This is a little disappointing. ScanQuery would probably work, but it’s 
not as efficient (can’t use indexes etc.). Are there any plans to enable 
isolation on SqlQuery?
-KS

From: Ilya Kasnacheev [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 26 listopada 2018 08:01
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Continuous queries and duplicates

Hello!

SQL queries have no isolation currently so it is not possible to avoid the 
problem that you described. You could try switching to ScanQuery, see if it 
helps; or learning to deal with duplicates.

Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev


пт, 23 нояб. 2018 г. в 19:25, Sobolewski, Krzysztof 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>:
Hi,

I'm wanting to use a ContinuousQuery and there is a slight issue with how it 
transitions from the initial query to the notifications phase. It turns out 
that if there are additions to the cache happening while the continuous query 
runs, an entry may be reported twice - once by the initial query and once by 
the listener. This is confirmed by experiment, BTW :) The initial query in this 
case is an SqlQuery.

So my question is: is this intentional? Or is it a bug? Is there something I 
can do to mitigate this? Is this is an issue of isolation level?

Thanks a lot for any pointers :)
-KS

________________________________

Your Personal Data: We may collect and process information about you that may 
be subject to data protection laws. For more information about how we use and 
disclose your personal data, how we protect your information, our legal basis 
to use your information, your rights and who you can contact, please refer to: 
www.gs.com/privacy-notices<http://www.gs.com/privacy-notices><http://www.gs.com/privacy-notices>

________________________________

Your Personal Data: We may collect and process information about you that may 
be subject to data protection laws. For more information about how we use and 
disclose your personal data, how we protect your information, our legal basis 
to use your information, your rights and who you can contact, please refer to: 
www.gs.com/privacy-notices<http://www.gs.com/privacy-notices>

Reply via email to