Hi Ilya, Thank you for the idea. Yes, probably I will re-post older blog on habr/en, but, anyway, we've finished a new one: https://habr.com/ru/company/sberbank/blog/444264/ it is now in Russian, but I hope someday I will translate it to English and post it there.
Sincerely, Dmitriy Pavlov ср, 27 мар. 2019 г. в 18:17, Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>: > Hello! > > There's an English version of Habr now, did you consider reposting there? > > Regards, > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > чт, 21 мар. 2019 г. в 15:35, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org>: > >> Sorry for the late reply. Contributors are not ranked so weight is not >> measured. The community always prefer to build consensus. If consensus is >> not reached (this happens time-to-time), then feature or change should not >> appear in the product. >> >> By the way, Apache PMCs may veto changes with a technical justification >> explaining why change is bad. >> >> A final word in project development has PMC (it is a committee consisting >> of all its members). Practically Apache Ignite Community prefers wider >> consensus - from all contributors. >> >> In case something is going wrong, there is our last resort: >> https://www.apache.org/board/escalation But I don't remember any >> escalations. >> >> Priority of implementing features is solved in another way: if someone >> wants to implement something and the community does not reject it, so why >> not? There is no single priority for all contributors. >> >> ср, 17 окт. 2018 г. в 12:09, zaleslaw <zaleslaw....@gmail.com>: >> >>> [For discussion] It's interesting to know more about possible conflicts: >>> when >>> a few persons are involved in contribution as a commiters, for example, >>> and >>> they have different opinions about next steps in roadmap implementation >>> or >>> about certain feature. How to measure correctly their weights? One of >>> them >>> doing small bug fixes, another does large features. They are not ranked, >>> except amount of commits or code lines in github. Who can say last word? >>> >>> Imagine, only they are both understand something in this feature and its >>> priority. Votes couldn't help, right? How they should solve their >>> conflict? >>> Does you have any cases in your experience? >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/ >>> >>
