Hi,

Yes, comparing to DMA is apples and oranges comparison, but gives an idea of 
the relative gap in performance.

A better comparison would be to an alike product such as NCache. They claims 
20K wps*, thus 20 times faster than my ignite results, but obvs I'd have to 
compare using my scenario for a valid comparison. But this is more like the 
kind of gap in performance I'd expect vs DMA. But then NCache product is also 
quite different from ignite, so what to say?

regards,
John

http://www.alachisoft.com/ncache/ncache-performance-benchmarks.html

-----Original Message-----
From: Maxim.Pudov <pudov....@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 3:17 PM
To: user@ignite.apache.org
Subject: RE: cache update slow

Email received from outside the company. If in doubt don't click links nor open 
attachments!
________________________________

Glad you met your requirements. I think it is not fair to compare Ignite with 
direct memory access, so I can't really say whether this is a good result or 
not. In your case .net process starts a java process and communicates with it 
via JNI [1]. Also Ignite stores cache data off-heap, which requires 
serialisation [2].

[1] https://apacheignite-net.readme.io/docs#section-ignite-and-ignitenet
[2] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/durable-memory



--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/

________________________________
This message is confidential and is for the sole use of the intended 
recipient(s). It may also be privileged or otherwise protected by copyright or 
other legal rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know by 
reply email and delete it from your system. It is prohibited to copy this 
message or disclose its content to anyone. Any confidentiality or privilege is 
not waived or lost by any mistaken delivery or unauthorized disclosure of the 
message. All messages sent to and from Agoda may be monitored to ensure 
compliance with company policies, to protect the company's interests and to 
remove potential malware. Electronic messages may be intercepted, amended, lost 
or deleted, or contain viruses.

Reply via email to