Hello Ilya,

Yes, you are right. I sent my first response too quickly. With an extra
column it will work.
I will go with the approach you suggest. :-)


Kind regards,

Stéphane Thibaud

2019年5月20日(月) 20:26 Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>:

> Hello!
>
> I'm not sure why you think it will not scale. If this field is indexed
> then taking a random sample is basically one b-tree walk away.
>
> I guess you will have to store random numbers, if you rely on non-random
> field it might introduce bias.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Ilya Kasnacheev
>
>
> пн, 20 мая 2019 г. в 13:28, Stéphane Thibaud <snthib...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello Ilya,
>>
>> Thank you for that suggestion. On a traditional database I know that
>> approach does not scale well, since a random number is first assigned to
>> all rows (it scales linearly with the number of rows if I am not mistaken).
>> Do you think this would be different for Ignite?
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Stéphane Thibaud
>>
>> 2019年5月20日(月) 15:53 Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> You can have a random indexed field in your table and do queries like
>>> SELECT * FROM table WHERE rand_field < RAND() LIMIT 1; to sample random
>>> item.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> --
>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
>>>
>>>
>>> пн, 20 мая 2019 г. в 04:50, Stéphane Thibaud <snthib...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> As a small addition: it would really help if Ignite had a hashing
>>>> function for this, but I only see AES encryption.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>
>>>> Stéphane Thibaud
>>>>
>>>> 2019年5月19日(日) 20:59 Stéphane Thibaud <snthib...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Ignite users,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am considering to sample randomly on large amounts of data, but I
>>>>> was wondering what would be the most efficient way for this. Right now, I
>>>>> think I might need cluster-based randomness using a MOD function as
>>>>> described here:
>>>>> https://www.alandix.com/academic/topics/random/sampling-SQL.html
>>>>>
>>>>> I currently have a UUID column (uuid4), which I think can be used for
>>>>> it, but I might need some bit manipulation to get the non-random parts out
>>>>> of the UUID.
>>>>> Do you think this is indeed the most straightforward way to do it?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Stéphane Thibaud
>>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to