I have a set of nodes, and I want to be able to set a cache in specific
nodes. It works, but whenever I turn on a new node the cache is
automatically spread to that node, which then causes errors like:
Failed over job to a new node ( I guess that there was a computation going
on in a node that shouldn't have computed that, and was shut down in the
meantime).
I don't know if I'm doing something wrong here or I'm missing something.
As I understand it, NodeFilter and Affinity are equivalent in my case
(Affinity is a node filter which also creates rules on where can the cache
spread from a given node?). With rebalance mode set to NONE, shouldn't the
cache be spread on the "nodesForOptimization" nodes, according to either
the node filter or the affinityFunction?
Here's my code:
List<UUID> nodesForOptimization = fetchNodes();
CacheConfiguration<String, Graph> graphCfg = new
CacheConfiguration<>(graphCacheName);
graphCfg = graphCfg.setCacheMode(CacheMode.REPLICATED)
.setBackups(nodesForOptimization.size() - 1)
.setAtomicityMode(CacheAtomicityMode.ATOMIC)
.setRebalanceMode(CacheRebalanceMode.NONE)
.setStoreKeepBinary(true)
.setCopyOnRead(false)
.setOnheapCacheEnabled(false)
.setNodeFilter(u -> nodesForOptimization.contains(u.id()))
.setAffinity(
new RendezvousAffinityFunction(
1024,
(c1, c2) -> nodesForOptimization.contains(c1.id()) &&
nodesForOptimization.contains(c2.id())
)
)
.setWriteSynchronizationMode(CacheWriteSynchronizationMode.FULL_SYNC);