Hi Prasad,

The ticket is resolved with fix version 2.8, which was not released
yet. Unfortunately we overlooked to include it into 2.7.6 scope. Sorry
for that.

пт, 27 сент. 2019 г. в 16:49, Prasad Bhalerao <[email protected]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> this issue still exists in ignite 2.7.6 version but the ticket is marked as 
> Fixed. I am still able to reproduce the issue using following reproducer.
>
> Because this issue I am not able to upgrade to latest version from 2.6.0 
> version.
>
> GitHub project: https://github.com/prasadbhalerao1983/IgniteTestPrj.git
>
> Please run IgniteTransactionTester class to check the issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Prasad
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:22 PM Ilya Kasnacheev <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I have filed a blocker ticket about it: 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10884
>>
>> Regards,
>> --
>> Ilya Kasnacheev
>>
>>
>> ср, 9 янв. 2019 г. в 17:43, Prasad Bhalerao <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Ilya,
>>>
>>> I have created a reproducer for this issue and uploaded it to GitHub.
>>>
>>> GitHub project: https://github.com/prasadbhalerao1983/IgniteTestPrj.git
>>>
>>> Please run IgniteTransactionTester class to check the issue.
>>>
>>>
>>> Exception:
>>>
>>> Exception in thread "main" javax.cache.CacheException: Only pessimistic 
>>> repeatable read transactions are supported at the moment.
>>>  at 
>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.IgniteCacheProxyImpl.query(IgniteCacheProxyImpl.java:697)
>>>  at 
>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.IgniteCacheProxyImpl.query(IgniteCacheProxyImpl.java:636)
>>>  at 
>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GatewayProtectedCacheProxy.query(GatewayProtectedCacheProxy.java:388)
>>>  at 
>>> IgniteTransactionTester.testTransactionException(IgniteTransactionTester.java:53)
>>>  at IgniteTransactionTester.main(IgniteTransactionTester.java:38)
>>> Caused by: class 
>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.query.IgniteSQLException: Only 
>>> pessimistic repeatable read transactions are supported at the moment.
>>>  at 
>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.mvcc.MvccUtils.tx(MvccUtils.java:690)
>>>  at 
>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.mvcc.MvccUtils.tx(MvccUtils.java:671)
>>>  at 
>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.query.h2.IgniteH2Indexing.runQueryTwoStep(IgniteH2Indexing.java:1793)
>>>  at 
>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.query.h2.IgniteH2Indexing.doRunDistributedQuery(IgniteH2Indexing.java:2610)
>>>  at 
>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.query.h2.IgniteH2Indexing.doRunPrepared(IgniteH2Indexing.java:2315)
>>>  at 
>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.query.h2.IgniteH2Indexing.querySqlFields(IgniteH2Indexing.java:2209)
>>>  at 
>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.query.GridQueryProcessor$4.applyx(GridQueryProcessor.java:2135)
>>>  at 
>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.query.GridQueryProcessor$4.applyx(GridQueryProcessor.java:2130)
>>>  at 
>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.util.lang.IgniteOutClosureX.apply(IgniteOutClosureX.java:36)
>>>  at 
>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.query.GridQueryProcessor.executeQuery(GridQueryProcessor.java:2707)
>>>  at 
>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.query.GridQueryProcessor.querySqlFields(GridQueryProcessor.java:2144)
>>>  at 
>>> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.IgniteCacheProxyImpl.query(IgniteCacheProxyImpl.java:685)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Prasad
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 6:22 PM Ilya Kasnacheev <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello!
>>>>
>>>> It was discussed recently: 
>>>> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Migrate-from-2-6-to-2-7-td25738.html
>>>>
>>>> I don't think you will be able to use SQL from transactions in Ignite 2.7. 
>>>> While this looks like a regression, you will have to work around it for 
>>>> now.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have a small reproducer for this issue? I could file a ticket if 
>>>> you had. You can try to do it yourself, too.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> --
>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ср, 9 янв. 2019 г. в 15:33, Prasad Bhalerao <[email protected]>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> My cache configuration is as follows. I am using TRANSACTIONAL and not  
>>>>> TRANSACTIONAL_SNAPSHOT.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> private CacheConfiguration ipContainerIPV4CacheCfg() {
>>>>>
>>>>>   CacheConfiguration ipContainerIpV4CacheCfg = new 
>>>>> CacheConfiguration<>(CacheName.IP_CONTAINER_IPV4_CACHE.name());
>>>>>   
>>>>> ipContainerIpV4CacheCfg.setAtomicityMode(CacheAtomicityMode.TRANSACTIONAL);
>>>>>   ipContainerIpV4CacheCfg.setWriteThrough(ENABLE_WRITE_THROUGH);
>>>>>   ipContainerIpV4CacheCfg.setReadThrough(false);
>>>>>   ipContainerIpV4CacheCfg.setRebalanceMode(CacheRebalanceMode.ASYNC);
>>>>>   
>>>>> ipContainerIpV4CacheCfg.setWriteSynchronizationMode(CacheWriteSynchronizationMode.FULL_SYNC);
>>>>>   ipContainerIpV4CacheCfg.setBackups(1);
>>>>>   Factory<IpContainerIpV4CacheStore> storeFactory = 
>>>>> FactoryBuilder.factoryOf(IpContainerIpV4CacheStore.class);
>>>>>   ipContainerIpV4CacheCfg.setCacheStoreFactory(storeFactory);
>>>>>   ipContainerIpV4CacheCfg.setIndexedTypes(DefaultDataAffinityKey.class, 
>>>>> IpContainerIpV4Data.class);
>>>>>   
>>>>> ipContainerIpV4CacheCfg.setCacheStoreSessionListenerFactories(cacheStoreSessionListenerFactory());
>>>>>   ipContainerIpV4CacheCfg.setSqlIndexMaxInlineSize(84);
>>>>>   RendezvousAffinityFunction affinityFunction = new 
>>>>> RendezvousAffinityFunction();
>>>>>   affinityFunction.setExcludeNeighbors(true);
>>>>>   ipContainerIpV4CacheCfg.setAffinity(affinityFunction);
>>>>>   ipContainerIpV4CacheCfg.setStatisticsEnabled(true);
>>>>>
>>>>>   return ipContainerIpV4CacheCfg;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Prasad
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 5:45 PM Павлухин Иван <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Prasad,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > javax.cache.CacheException: Only pessimistic repeatable read 
>>>>>> > transactions are supported at the moment.
>>>>>> Exception mentioned by you should happen only for cache with
>>>>>> TRANSACTIONAL_SNAPSHOT atomicity mode configured. Have you configured
>>>>>> TRANSACTIONAL_SNAPSHOT atomicity for any cache? As Denis mentioned
>>>>>> there are number of bugs related to TRANSACTIONAL_SNAPSHOT, e.g. [1].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10520
>>>>>>
>>>>>> вс, 6 янв. 2019 г. в 20:03, Denis Magda <[email protected]>:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Hello,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Ignite versions prior to 2.7 never supported transactions for SQL 
>>>>>> > queries. You were enlisting SQL in transactions for your own risk. 
>>>>>> > Ignite version 2.7 introduced true transactional support for SQL based 
>>>>>> > on MVCC. Presently it's in beta with GA to be available around Q2-Q3 
>>>>>> > this year. The community is working on optimizations.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Please refer to this docs for more details:
>>>>>> > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/multiversion-concurrency-control
>>>>>> > https://apacheignite-sql.readme.io/docs/transactions
>>>>>> > https://apacheignite-sql.readme.io/docs/multiversion-concurrency-control
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > --
>>>>>> > Denis
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 7:48 PM Prasad Bhalerao 
>>>>>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Can someone please explain if anything has changed in ignite 2.7.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Started getting this exception after upgrading to 2.7.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>>>> >> From: Prasad Bhalerao <[email protected]>
>>>>>> >> Date: Fri 4 Jan, 2019, 8:41 PM
>>>>>> >> Subject: Re: Getting javax.cache.CacheException after upgrading to 
>>>>>> >> Ignite
>>>>>> >> 2.7
>>>>>> >> To: <[email protected]>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Can someone please help me with this?
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> On Thu 3 Jan, 2019, 7:15 PM Prasad Bhalerao 
>>>>>> >> <[email protected]
>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> > Hi
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > After upgrading to 2.7 version I am getting following exception. I 
>>>>>> >> > am
>>>>>> >> > executing a SELECT sql inside optimistic transaction with 
>>>>>> >> > serialization
>>>>>> >> > isolation level.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > 1) Has anything changed from 2.6 to 2.7 version?  This work fine 
>>>>>> >> > prior to
>>>>>> >> > 2.7 version.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > After changing it to Pessimistic and isolation level to 
>>>>>> >> > REPEATABLE_READ it
>>>>>> >> > works fine.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > *javax.cache.CacheException: Only pessimistic repeatable read 
>>>>>> >> > transactions
>>>>>> >> > are supported at the moment.at
>>>>>> >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.IgniteCacheProxyImpl.query(IgniteCacheProxyImpl.java:697)at
>>>>>> >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.IgniteCacheProxyImpl.query(IgniteCacheProxyImpl.java:636)at
>>>>>> >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GatewayProtectedCacheProxy.query(GatewayProtectedCacheProxy.java:388)at
>>>>>> >> > com.qualys.agms.grid.dao.AbstractDataGridDAO.getFieldResultsByCriteria(AbstractDataGridDAO.java:85)*
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Thanks,
>>>>>> >> > Prasad
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin



-- 
Best regards,
Ivan Pavlukhin

Reply via email to