It worth noting that users should be cautious with SQL transactions.
As fair SQL transactions are supported only for TRANSACTIONAL_SNAPSHOT
mode which are still kind of experimental feature [1].

[1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/multiversion-concurrency-control

пт, 6 дек. 2019 г. в 15:12, Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hello!
>
> As we have discussed privately, ODBC is actually the C++ thin SQL client, and 
> it supports transactions since 2.7.
>
> C++ code should look forward to using ODBC to communicate with Ignite.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Ilya Kasnacheev
>
>
> пн, 2 дек. 2019 г. в 16:26, Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org>:
>>
>> Ivan,
>>
>> You are right. Though now we have transactions support in thin client 
>> protocol,
>> It is only now implemented for Java. Also, C++ thin client yet to support 
>> SQL.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Igor
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 9:35 AM Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Igor,
>>>
>>> Could you please elaborate whether C++ thin client is going to have
>>> transactions support in 2.8? AFAIR, it was implemented only for Java
>>> thin client.
>>>
>>> пт, 29 нояб. 2019 г. в 18:29, Stephen Darlington
>>> <stephen.darling...@gridgain.com>:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > The ticket says “Fix version: 2.8” so I would assume it would be 
>>> > available then. Currently planned for late January.
>>> >
>>> > > On 29 Nov 2019, at 13:58, dkurzaj <dori...@hotmail.fr> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Hello,
>>> > >
>>> > > Since this improvement : 
>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9410
>>> > > is resolved, I'd assume that it is now possible to do SQL transactions 
>>> > > using
>>> > > the C++ thin client, though I'm not sure it is yet since I did not find
>>> > > documentation about that. Would someone happen to know more about this
>>> > > subject?
>>> > >
>>> > > Thank you!
>>> > >
>>> > > Dorian
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Ivan Pavlukhin



-- 
Best regards,
Ivan Pavlukhin

Reply via email to